Category: English
-
Ján Figeľ’s speech at the International Consultation on Christian Persecution in Budapest, Hungary
International Consultation on Christian Persecution – Finding the Appropriate Answers to a Long Neglected Crisis
Your Holiness, Beatitudes, Eminence, Excellencies, Minister, MPs,
Dear Friends, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Answers can be found successfully if we use our reason and if we seek COMMON GOOD! In the 21th Century either Common Good will prevail or IDEOLOGIES OF SUPERIORITY: superiority of a nation, a religion, a race, a social class… There are many important even tragic examples in the history of humankind. And as a consequence, either PEACE, JUSTICE, HUMANITY will prevail or hatred, violence and conflicts
Viktor Orbán, the Prime Minister of Hungary
True Christianity was always protagonist of common good, and became one of first victims of militant ideologies. We know this from our Czechoslovak or Hungarian or Soviet totalitarian past.
I am here as the first ever Special Envoy for promotion freedom of religion or belief outside the European Union. It is a fruit of martyrdom in the Middle East. Decision of President Juncker and Commission came out after the EP Resolution on mass atrocities on the territories of Iraq and Syria under ISIS dominance (February 2016). Daesh/ISIS is not a religion; it is brutal misuse of religion. As a terrorist organization it must be eliminated.
60-years old EU deals today more with FoRB, which is essential value. It represents freedom of conscience and human dignity for all and everywhere.
In recent years the EU started to build up agenda and tools around FoRB protection and promotion. In 2013 Council has adopted common Guidelines for foreign policy of 28 member states. After the last EP elections in 2014 the
EP Intergroup for FoRB and Religious Tolerance was established. I would like to commend work of Peter van Dalen, Dennis de Jong and other members.
Lars Adaktusson and Gyorgy Hölvenyi, very active members, are here with us today as well. As the EU Special Envoy I visited Iraq, Jordan, UAE, Sudan, and Morocco. These were meaningful and important missions. For example our engagement in Sudan has helped to the release of jailed Christians Petr Jašek, Revevend Taour, layman Abdumawla, prisoners of conscience, human rights defender Professor Mudawi and five other activists.
As a Special Envoy I established regular working relations with NGOs, Charities and faith-based organisations (FBOs). Likewise, we keep frequent dialogue with faith leaders from different religions and countries. I plan to visit Senegal, Egypt, Pakistan, Lebanon, hopefully also Myanmar, Iran… – to promote inter-faith dialogue and FoRB, religious literacy and education for pluralistic society, legislative reforms for religious and ethnic tolerance. We use more the main financial development instrument for this field – EIDHR (1.4 bn €), part of EU development aid. After 25 years of Lorenzo Natali Media Prize for development journalism there is a new segment – LN Prize for FoRB journalism, both professional and amateur.
I am glad that European Academy of Religion started to operate in historic Bologna, aimed at promotion of academic and scientific cooperation of many universities, faculties, institutes, chairs, journals from Europe, MENA countries and some other countries of the world.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Persecution of Christians today is unparalleled historically. There are many reports speaking on this. There are even books published with testimonies and stories. John Allen in his book Global War against Christians estimates that up to 100 thousand Christians are being killed annually for their faith in recent years. Moving evidence can be read in the book of Ruppert Shortt Christianophobia – A faith under attack.
Pew Research Centre (USA) tells us that Christians have been harassed in more countries than any other religious group and have suffered harassment in many of the Muslim-majority countries of the Middle East and North Africa.
It also signals that is important to read this against huge size and broad geographic dispersion of Christians around the world. Christians were harassed by governments or social groups in a total of 128 countries in 2015, i.e. in more countries than any other religious group.
We all agree that there is today a particular focus on persecution of Christian minorities in the Middle East – and for good reasons. Since 2014 there were even GENOCIDAL attacks made by the ISIS militants. The number of Christians is drastically decreasing here. This is a civilizational challenge.
But persecution rarely targets just one minority. As we see in Syria and Iraq, not only Christians, but also Yazidis, Shia-Muslims and other minorities are suffering from discrimination, harassment and persecution. There are plenty of examples : In Pakistan, Ahmadis suffer as well as Shias. In Sudan, Sufis. In Iran, the Baha’is, In Myanmar Rohingias are persecuted by Buddhist nationalists. In China, it is the Falun-gong, in India several minorities suffer discrimination, in North Korea all people of faith suffer from cruel dictatorship.
If a society allows for the persecution of one minority, it lays the ground for persecution of other minorities.
But, there are 2.3 billion Christians globally; it is more members than any other religious group. Roughly two-thirds of the world’s countries, for example, have Christian majorities! So, why there is such negative situation of Christians in many countries? My answer is: Because we are many times indifferent, ignorant or scared to say something on behalf of the voiceless and defenceless people and to do something for real justice. Evil has allies in each population. The most potent are the three of them: INDIFFERENCE, IGNORANCE, and FEAR.
What to do with this situation?
1) We must work better and more for peace and justice. Let us learn from the history and, as a minimum, avoid repetition of the mistakes.
As a Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee of the Slovak Parliament I did not voted in favour of the US-led invasion to Iraq in 2003, supported then by the Slovak Government. Then I felt, today I know, I was right. When I visited Iraq – Baghdad, Najaf, Erbil – this year, somebody told me: Christians in this country survived Arab conquest, Mongolian conquest and Otoman conquest, but may be definitely depleted by Bush-Blair invasion. Invasion led by Christian leaders! Patriarch Younan spoke here clearly about the chaos created afterwards.
Lesson? Wise use of military force in international relations, in line with international law; promote justice for all and everywhere, effectively prevent conflicts and especially mass atrocities. We must acknowledge that international community in the last Century – but also today – repeatedly failed in three “P”s delivery. To PREVENT, PROTECT, PUNISH – to prevent mass atrocities and a genocide, to protect victims of such crimes against humanity, and to punish perpetrators of such crimes. And we fail again and again, while the promise was NEVER AGAIN!
Christians and religious minorities found themselves abandoned facing the cruelty of ISIS, as we heard from His Holiness Ignatius Afrem. It is crucial to stop war in Syria and look for political solution, and for stability, wiping out ISIS ideology and renewal in Iraq. Special responsibility is on the shoulders of the UN Security Council Permanent Members – US, Russia, China, UK, France. It is first of all the responsibility in protecting peace and security, more than honour to be a Permanent Member.
UN and democratic countries are invited to provide effective, timely, uncorrupted humanitarian aid, as this becomes matter of urgency and acute assistance on the conflict spots. And care much more for justice and rule of law, as peace is fruit of justice. Reconciliation without justice is not perceivable.
Unfortunately, UN SC is very slow in responding to justice in Iraq. While Iraqi Government requested support in investigation of ISIS crimes already in May 2016 request, approval of the resolution came only in September 2017!
Security and Reconstruction should follow the peace process, as pledging conferences on Iraq, Syrian London and Brussels respectively agreed on 6 bn US$ of financial support.
All refugees have right to return to their homes and property. But without security guaranteed IDPs will not return! Heavily destroyed cities of Mosul, Aleppo can be rebuild and renewed like Dresden or Stalingrad/Volgograd after WW2.
In reconciliation process special Role of Christians is envisaged. Remember that EU came into being as a fruit of reconciliation and due to specially Christian politicians active and founding leadership. Without Christian communities and societal contribution this region will not be what it historically was.
In the chaos which is today the Middle East, we cannot talk on persecutions targeting only Christians. What are going on is also an intra-Muslim conflicts between Sunnis and Shias and other ethnic and religious fractions.
There is a common threat today: the manipulation of religion. Ignorance fuels misperceptions and political mistakes. We have to build trust and defeat hatred and militant ideology of ISIS as well.
Bashar Matti Warda, the Chaldean Catholic Archbishop of Erbil, Iraq and Mgr Nicodemus Daoud Sharaf, the Syriac Orthodox Archbishop of Mosul
2) Work on equal citizenship and revisit the concept of minorities
Together with Archbishop Warda from Erbil and Hungarian Government I would like to put stress on education, as it is the most efficient tool to change man and society! Christian’s schools in many countries all over the world are considered top quality. In Pakistan for example the elite send their kids there. The same happens in Palestine. These schools are open to all. They are a laboratory for interreligious, peaceful cohabitation.
Different communities need relevant education for living together in diversity. We need to learn how to live together, not only to exist together. Optimal answer is shared society, in which responsibility is based on PARTICIPATION.
Defining principle for reconciled and shared society is EQUAL CITIZENSHIP, not particular religion or ethnicity. Idea of equal citizenship[4] is gathering consensus throughout religious and political affiliations. This is the recipe for Christians and for all communities in Iraq, Syria and in the Middle East.
In Kurdistan recently by law the term “minority” was replaced by “social component”. “Minority” has somehow a confrontational flavour; you read it “versus majority”. Syrian Christian leaders when we met advised to use term “communities”.
A long-term strategic approach to protect Christian and other religious communities must focus on changing those majority cultures and state structures that enable and encourage discrimination, harassment and persecution. Therefore we welcomed Marrakesh Declaration on these issues in Muslim majority countries. But it needs to be brought into practice.
I was pleased when I met Shia Grand Ayatollah Al Najafi and later on Chaldean Patriarch Louis Raphael Sako to hear the same language – future Iraq as civil state! Fair secular state is a blessing for society. It is public space opener for plurality of relegions and beliefs. Unfair or false secular state closes down public space, tries to replace religion with secularism or other ideologies.
His Grace Bishop Ermia, General Bishop and Head of the Coptic Orthodox Cultural Center
3) Better cooperation and partnership is needed between the EU and Member States, international organisations, NGOs, CSOs, FBOs and religious leaders. This will create more synergy in reaching positive impact.
Due to many reasons there is growing importance of more direct cooperation with local faith communities.
I would like to praise work of many organisations in the conflict areas, particularly the ACN, Open Doors, CSW, Brot für die Welt, Knights of Columbus, L’Oeuvre d’Orient, SOS Chretiens d’Orient, and others.
I support and recommend cooperation with credible religious leaders and FBOs – Charities. Many times religious leaders posses more credibility, authority or stability than political leaders. They really can significantly contribute to peace, return of refugees, reconciliation.
HUNGARY & V4
Hungary is to be commended for this initiative, for HUNGARY HELPS Program, for awareness raising, students’ scholarships, school construction, reconstruction and development aid, etc. I congratulate to parliamentary Resolution denouncing the ISIS genocide adopted by consensus.
I thank Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Minister Zoltan Balogh, State Under-Secretary Tamás Törok and wish success to his new successor. We need more of such fruitful support for saving depleted Christian and other communities.
V4 cooperation under Hungarian Presidency should multiply this initiative and build national partnerships between Government and Churches and Charities and provide joint support to targeted communities in the Middle East countries or globally, where effective aid and reconstruction is needed. V4 format could be easily enlarged into regional approach. I have even suitable , inviting name for this: MIDDLE EUROPE HELPS MIDLE EAST! Cooperation will assist communities in need in the places of conflict, and show real people-to-people solidarity. And it would bring positive image for Visegrad countries in time of migration and refugee crisis and in time of European political disputes.
CONSCLUSION
I refuse concept of Clash of Civilizations. But there is a threat, even visible impact of a potentially big clash: CLASH OF IGNORANCES. IGNORANCE, INDIFFERENCE and FEAR are allies of evil. Opposites of them are EDUCATION, ENGAGEMENT & COURAGE. All of them are present and promoted these days here at our Budapest meeting and activities.
Let us work against deficits of human responsibility and maturity. I wish these phenomena remain growing and becoming dominant in our societies and institutions of state power and bring positive fruits for Christians and other faith communities in the world.
Ján Figeľ, EU Special Envoy
Budapest, October 12, 2017
-
Ján Figeľ and András Sajó open the 24th Annual International Law and Religion Symposium
The video recording of the Symposium
Two distinguished Keynote speakers addressed participants from around the world assembled for the opening session of the 24th Annual International Law and Religion Symposium. In addition to an address by Ján Figeľ, Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of religion or Belief Outside the European Union, those assembled at the J. Rueben Clark Law School and participants via webcast, were privileged to hear from András Sajó, Former Judge and Vice-President of the European Court of Human Rights.
The opening session commenced with the Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies, Brett G. Sharffs welcoming attendees and inviting them to reflect on the role religion can play in building peace, stability, and harmony or alternatively contributing to disunity and violence. BYU President Kevin J. Worthen, and Dean of the J. Reuben Clark Law School, Gordon Smith, then also welcomed attendees, after which the Founding Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies, W. Cole Durham Jr. introduced the Keynote speakers.
Ján Figeľ’s message focused on the political and social dimensions of religious freedom in a changing world. He expressed that freedom of religion or belief is the litmus test of all human rights because it is linked to a litany of other rights including freedom of thought, conscience, and conviction, as well as the right to assembly, association, and expression. As a consequence of this expansiveness, Figeľ explained “respect of human rights is not possible without respecting freedom of religion or belief.” Nevertheless, global statistics reveal a gloomy picture, as three-quarters of the world’s population live in countries where freedom of religion is highly restricted. The scale of these restrictions ranges from intolerance, to discrimination, to persecution, and even genocide. He expressed, “Society needs to learn to live in diversity, not just exist in diversity.” With the forced migration of a record number of people (245 million), it is time to think about religious climate change and to overcome ignorance, illiteracy, and divisions, and work for peace, justice, sustainable development, and human dignity for all. Figeľ explained peace is the fruit of justice, while warning that evil has three decisive allies: ignorance, indifference, and fear. These are combatted with courage, education, and responsibility. While the world is changing, resulting in uncertainty and conflict, Figeľ expressed that one thing should not and does not change: our shared commitment to upholding human dignity and protecting fundamental human rights.
Following Ján Figeľ’s remarks, András Sajó spoke of the detrimental effects on religious freedom resulting from a decline in liberty, dedicating his remarks to W. Cole Durham Jr. He identified three particular assaults on liberty including contemporary security concerns, the extension of the public sphere and government services, and the shift in the freedom to manifest religion from a matter of liberty toward being a matter of personal identity. Sajó related how historically, countries have justified security-based restrictions on religion as necessary to protect society against subversion or affronts to national identity. While some argue that radical religious teachings should be prohibited, the adoption of so-called subversive doctrines may destroy the current framework of protections for all religions. Sajó then turned to the problems related to the “cult of personal identity,” asserting that new human rights have been created in the last 20-30 years that have extended the public sphere and created a tension with religious rights. For instance, because religions command external action that overlaps with ordinary human conduct, such as conduct related to diet, appearance, and social interactions, freedom of religion increasingly comes into conflict with these new rights and the prevailing forms of public order, especially where public order is secularized. However, Sajó argues the state should respect religious demands on conduct as long as they are compatible with other peoples’ freedoms. That entails toleration of such practices even if that toleration may cause some emotional discomfort for others. Ordinary emotional discomfort cannot be sufficient grounds for restricting religious expression. Sajó concluded his message with a request for tolerance and by expressing his hope that participants in the democratic process would understand the moral superiority and practical advantages of the dictates of liberty.
by Melissa Hartman, BYU Law Student and Symposium Volunteer
The article is available here: https://www.iclrs.org/index.php?pageId=2&contentId=19&blurbId=84356
-
Campaigner: Religious freedom envoy must be permanent part of EU’s foreign policy team
Jan Figel, the EU’s special envoy for religious freedom, meets Patriarch Gregory III. [European Commission]
The EU appointed its first special envoy on religious freedom in May 2016. Jan Figel’s 12-month mandate has now been extended for another year and Sophia Kuby of the Alliance for Defending Freedom (ADF) explains why his role should be strengthened.
Sophia Kuby serves as director of European Union advocacy for ADF International in Belgium.
Kuby spoke to Benjamin Fox.
How do you assess the progress so far of the Special Envoy post?
We are very happy that this post was created. Given the rise of intolerance and persecution of religious minorities, the creation of the post was expedient and necessary. It is a major step forward for the EU Commission to acknowledge that religious freedom needs to be addressed more explicitly than just as part of general human rights policy.
Traditionally the prevailing opinion has been that the EU institutions didn’t want to ‘single out’ religious freedom. It was and still is subsumed under the portfolio of the EU Special Representative for Human Rights.
But with the blatant tragedy of religious persecution going on in the Middle East, a new awareness has arisen that the rest of the world cannot stand idly by. The Special Envoy has been called for in this context, namely when the European Parliament voted on a resolution that recognised the atrocities in the Middle East as genocide. The resolution got overwhelming support from across the political spectrum.
It took the horrible issue of genocide in the Middle East to show that addressing human rights violations specifically based on religion is not a problem, but a call of the times we live in today.
The creation of the Special Envoy was an important step forward, but it is not enough. It is a rather weak mandate that is not properly equipped with budget and institutional clout to fulfil a complex and important mission. Ideally, the post would be moved from the Commission (currently at the DG for development) to the External Action Service (EEAS).
So you would want the Special Envoy’s role integrated as part of the EU’s foreign policy?
That’s correct. The EEAS would be the best place for that mandate and the mandate itself needs to be institutionalised. The Special Envoy has got a remarkable amount coverage in the media and had some tangible successes such as freeing a Sudanese pastor and a Czech missionary imprisoned unjustly in Sudan.
But beyond that, institutional working relationships need to be defined between the Special Envoy and the institutions, such as regular mandatory reporting on FoRB-related developments. His work needs to be integrated into the institutional set-up of the EU.
What else would you propose to strengthen the mandate?
Certainly, the mandate needs to be extended in breaths, depth and lengths. A one-year term is too short to pursue any strategic plan. It should be extended to a multi-year term.
What should be the main task of such a position at the EEAS?
The Council has issues EU Guidelines on freedom of religion or belief in 2013. These guidelines contain many good points on how the EU should tackle the topic in its foreign policy. Guiding and helping the EEAS and the Commission to implement the guidelines should be a primary focus of the mandate.
The Commission and the EEAS themselves admit that there needs to be a better implementation of the guidelines. The challenge ahead is not to re-invent the wheel, but to effectively implement them with a horizontal approach in the EU foreign policy. In order to be able to do this, the Special Envoy needs more institutional weight and power, in other words, an institutional anchorage.
It’s still largely symbolic then at the moment, without a clear institutional mandate?
Yes, it’s largely symbolic but we shouldn’t underestimate its importance. The fact that this mandate has been created is significant.
Could the Special Envoy ultimately be used to ensure that promoting religious freedom was almost a tool in EU trade talks and in terms of how it awards development aid?
This is the direction it should go, yes. The EU has significant means to leverage religious freedom through trade and other agreements at a worldwide scale. It has a lot of money to give away and the EU is in an incredibly powerful position to make FoRB a condition for economic cooperation.
The EU already does that. Countries are asked to do all sorts of things in order to have access to foreign aid so it’s not as if the EU gives away money without any strings attached. The question is: where is the focus?
It has over 140 missions across the world on the ground and has an extensive diplomatic corps. An important question is whether the EU will develop the political will to actually use its power to promote religious freedom. It’s not a question of not being able to, it’s a question of having the political will to do it.
So it’s really up to the EU whether it wants to use its power?
Yes.
Have there any recent developments towards beefing up the Special Envoy role?
The first success is that the mandate has been renewed. I think that Mr Figel has created good alliances inside and outside the institutions. It is normal that it takes time to convince the various different players in the institutions of an institutionalised position on religious freedom. But it seems that things move in a good direction.
I guess at the moment it is still a fairly low-profile, semi-official role.
Yes, but what is quite remarkable is that the Special Envoy is perceived as the ‘face’ of the EU promoting freedom of religion or belief. He is often received at ambassador or ministerial level despite the fact that he is, technically speaking, a special advisor to the commissioner for development. That means that there is an expectation in the world that the EU has a face for religious freedom.
The article is available here: https://www.euractiv.com/section/freedom-of-thought/interview/religious-freedom-envoy-must-be-permanent-part-of-eus-foreign-policy-team/
-
What Difference Does a Special Envoy on Freedom of Religion or Belief Make?
As Ján Figel starts his second year as the EU Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) outside the European Union, the last 12 months of his time in this new mandate show the respect for this role that has developed amongst sceptics and the potential for his role going forward.
In under 12 months Mr Figel has raised the profile of FoRB as a human rights priority for the EU, highlighting the important role religion and belief, including the right not to believe, plays in the daily experience of millions across the globe.
Early on in his first term the Special Envoy said “FoRB is a litmus test for general human rights… Those who don’t understand, religion and the abuse of religion can’t comprehend what is going on in the world today.” At the end of his first year, there has been a visible widening of EU engagement on this sensitive human right, as part of its dialogue and development policies.
“FoRB is a litmus test for general human rights… Those who don’t understand, religion and the abuse of religion can’t comprehend what is going on in the world today.” – Ján Figel, EU Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief
Sudan is one of several countries with poor human rights records which Mr Figel has visited in his first year. Such visits open up opportunities for a senior EU diplomat to engage with religious leaders and religious communities to address societal hostilities, in addition to working with government officials.
In March 2017, he used his visit to Sudan to promote freedom of religion or belief, intercultural and interreligious dialogue, peaceful coexistence of communities and better relations between Sudan and the EU. Sudan, as a priority country for the EU, but one with an appalling human rights record, was a bold choice of country to visit and indicative of Ján Figel’s personal commitment to FoRB and credibility with colleagues in the European Commission.
Approximately two weeks before his visit, Czech humanitarian worker, Peter Jašek, was released from prison after spending 14 months in Sudanese prison. Mr Jašek had been imprisoned alongside a Sudanese pastor, Reverend Hassan Abduraheem, and an activist called Abdulmonem Abdumawla, after being convicted on trumped-up charges of espionage. Peter Jašek received a presidential pardon and was released, however Reverend Hassan Abdulraheem and Mr Abdulmonem Abdumawla remained unjustly imprisoned. As part of his dialogue with Sudanese Officials, the Special Envoy called for a presidential pardon for them as well. Mr Figel also raised concerns over the demolition of churches that were targeted by the government. Reverend Hassan Abduraheem and activist Abdulmonem Abdumawla received a presidential pardon and were released on 11 May following further international pressure for their release.
“In countries like Sudan, where the EU has a number of interests ranging from migration, trade and security to the fight against terrorism, the mainstreaming of human rights mandates such as that of the EU Special Envoy on FoRB becomes an important and visible way for the EU to show itself to be serious on trying to tackle human rights challenges globally.”
In countries like Sudan, where the EU has a number of interests ranging from migration, trade and security to the fight against terrorism, the mainstreaming of human rights mandates such as that of the EU Special Envoy on FoRB becomes an important and visible way for the EU to show itself to be serious on trying to tackle human rights challenges globally. As was evident in Sudan, the presence of the EU’s Special Envoy was significant both in highlighting the EU’s commitment to mainstream this important right and its willingness to ensure it is part of the human rights dialogue points with Sudan.
As he enters the second year of his mandate, he does so in a climate of heightened interest in this topic by the European Parliament. Whilst the Special Envoy is based in the EU Commission, his re-appointment will complement the vital work of European External Action Service in working towards a mainstreaming of the 2013 Guidelines on Freedom of Religion or Belief across the EU’s work.
And there is much work to be done. With this in mind, President Juncker should do what he can to strengthen the mandate; for example, by resourcing it more fully and extending its term to enable longer-term planning. According to research by the Pew Forum, government restrictions and social hostilities linked to the freedom of religion of belief appear to be on the rise. These problems will not disappear overnight and there is always much more work to be done to reverse negative trends than to create them.
By CSW’s Sudan Advocacy Officer
The article: https://forbinfull.org/2017/05/16/what-difference-does-a-special-envoy-on-freedom-of-religion-or-belief-make/
-
Sudan releases pastor and activist sentenced for espionage
May 15, 2017 (KHARTOUM) – Last week, Sudanese President Omer al-Bashir pardoned a pastor and an activist sentenced together with a Czech missionary Petr Jasek who had already been released by the end of February.
The Rev. Hassan Abdurahim Tawor. (Christian Solidarity Worldwide Photo)
The two men were sentenced to 12 years for colluding with the Czech filmmaker who had been condemned for espionage, waging war against the state and inciting hatred against religious congregations.
According to a statement released by Middle East Concern (MEC), Rev. Hassan Abduraheem Kodi Taour and
Mr Abdulmonem Abdumawla are released on 11 May after a presidential pardon.
Their release comes about two months after a call by the European Union Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion, Jan Figel, to release them during a visit to Sudan on 19 March.
Sudan released Jasek on 26 February 2017, following a visit to Khartoum by the Czech Foreign Minister Lubomir Zaoralek.
The two had been arrested in December 2015 and sentenced were each sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment, on 29th January 2017.
The article is avilable here: http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article62475
-
Freedom of religion and belief beyond the EU’s borders
Religious freedom is one of the most essential human rights, enshrined solidly in international law. Being part of EU primary law, the Union has committed to promote and protect religious freedom worldwide.
However, according to the Pew Research Center, about three-quarters of the world’s population live in countries with high or very high restrictions or social hostilities to religious minorities. This decade has also witnessed a rise in religion-related terrorism, with some regions being more affected than others, which has also led to armed conflict and sectarian violence.
To answer to this global problem, in May 2016, Commission President Juncker appointed Ján Figel’ as the first Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the European Union. His mandate is due to expire in May 2017, potentially leaving the EU without representation in this arena.
EURACTIV organised a stakeholder workshop to discuss the freedom of religion and belief outside the EU. Questions included:
– How can the inclusion of all religious minorities be ensured?
– Should the mandate of the Special Envoy be renewed and if so, should his/her position be strengthened?
– Is the current institutional set-up suitable to guarantee the promotion and protection of freedom of religion and belief?
To see our upcoming events, visit: http://events.euractiv.com/
-
ISIS’ destruction to cost $200 million to rebuild Iraq’s Christians villages
Christian villages need $200 million (about 188 million euros) to facilitate their reconstruction in Iraq’s Nineveh Plain, according to the Pontifical Foundation ‘Aid to the Church in Need’. More than 12,000 houses have been vandalized by the cutthroats of ISIS in twelve Christian villages, including Qaraqosh, Batnaya, Bartella in the Nineveh Plain, where 669 of them have been set on fire and completely destroyed.
Iraq Survey – Destroyed houses in the Nineveh Plains
Almost half of Christian families who escaped ISIS soldiers and fled to Erbil, capital of the Iraqi Kurdistan, want to go back to their homeland and consider returning home, according to a poll ran by ‘Aid to the Church in Need’. Out of 1,500 Christian families they interviewed, 41% of them want to go back while 46% said that they are seriously considering their return. In a previous poll in November 2016, only 3% of Christians interviewed said they wanted to return to their abandoned villages once ISIS is defeated.
The return of Christians to their homeland is a crucial problem. Christianity risks extinction in Iraq and the real danger is the de-Christianisation of the region, the end-goal ISIS is striving for. In a step forward towards protection and resolution, the European Parliament and the Council of Europe recently recognized the systematic mass murder of Christians, Yazidis and other religious minorities in the Middle East as ‘genocide.’
And another sign of hope also comes from the EU, which “has committed itself to provide efficient complex aid, including financial one, on the road towards reconstruction of Iraq for its people, living in safe, just and democratic conditions” said Jan Figel, EU Special Envoy for Religious Freedom.
Watch interview to Jan Figel: “Europe needs to stand up to help minorities in Iraq!”
Trying to show strength and unity, ten Iraqi Christian-Assyrian parties met in Erbil at the end of March, asking the International Community for aid to create and recognize their region as an autonomous Christian province of the Nineveh Plain.
“We call EU High representative for Foreign Policy Federica Mogherini, the UN Security Council and the UN Mission to Iraq to recognize and to monitor the creation of an Autonomous Province of the Nineveh Plain to give to Iraqi Christians the possibility of their self-determination and to control their future,” said Kaldo Ramzi foreign policy adviser of the Christian-Assyrian Democratic party to The European Post.
The ball is now in Europe’s camp, which has the potential to successfully help the minorities in Iraq, according to Jan Figel. He was the first EU authority to visit Iraq in February this year, after years of isolation, where he met religious leaders and discussed the situation facing Iraq’s minorities. “It’s Europe’sresponsibility to help religious and ethnics minorities also because in Iraq there is a lot of anti-Americanism but there is not anti-Europeanism and Europe is seen as a credible partner,” Figel said in an interview with The European Post.
“Peaceful and united Europe was built after unprecedented bloodshed and on ruins of World War II through reconciliation, new relations based on justice and reconstruction including Marshall Plan. This is the road for Iraq and its people as well,” according to Figel.
(in the cover picture: a house totally destroyed and burnt in the Christian Village in Qaraqosh, Iraq; photo credit: Marco Gombacci – The European Post)
The article is available here: http://europeanpost.co/isis-destruction-to-cost-200-million-to-rebuild-iraqs-christians-villages/